the exhibitionists’ conundrum
.
.
article by kevin
.
Andrew, the idea that the sight of male genitals is mentally scarring to any female is a hoax perpetrated by ball-less legislative and judicial bodies that pander to the mis-androus (male hating) elements of society. Consider the fact that commercial TV advertises Cialis, Levitra, and Viagra 24/7, placing the images of erect penises in the minds of ALL viewers including adult and child females.
Yes, having taught 12-15 year old kids in public schools I can definitely say that virtually ALL girls are well familiar with the male anatomy even in a puritanical environment where I live. Internet censorship doesn’t work on these girls as their male friends share block bypasses with them. Anyone objecting to those facts is living in a fantasy world. The majority of girls enjoy asking their male family members “What is ED?” just so they can exert control over their male family members. Yes, this power struggle happens in nearly all families and the males are oblivious to the power take-over they didn’t even know was occurring. When they think they are outside the hearing of any male, these girls laugh about how stupid males are when these girls are deliberately embarrassing them. And that behavior continues into adult life.
And yet with ALL of the erect penis imagery that is generated by constant bombardment with Erectile Disfunction medication advertisement, not one of these sensitive females ever complains about the mental scarring from ED commercials saturating the airwaves. Oh, its not in-your-face penis imagery. As females always claim, they are not as visually oriented as males. Yet, the mental manipulation utilized by the ED commercials appeals precisely to the female mental process to satisfy their prurient interests. In fact, these commercials, like the daytime programming so prevalent in the US, is nothing more than female pornography.
So why isn’t this sort of media communication classified as female porno resulting in the criminalization of broadcasting?
Another factor influencing the spread and consolidation of gynophillic/androphobic philosophies is the constant media bombardment with images of male sexual assaults as a comedic technic while any depiction of female sexual assault as comedic is NOT politically correct. The PC/not PC social tool is actually a tool to subvert logic to brainwash people to think that sexual assault of males is morally, legally, and socially acceptable while sexual assault of females demand the death penalty.
Then there are the reduced penalties for female sexual predators that prey on male children with aggravating circumstances while the male predatory who preys on female children even with mitigating circumstances results in escalated penalties.
The fact is that politicians, judicial officials, and law enforcement do not have the balls to stand up and use logic and reason to place all human activities in proper prospective. Special interest groups of self-righteous hypocrites playing moral one-upsmanship with each other have twisted the original system far out of balance. When the rights of the few become worthless under the oppression of the power grabbing and greed of the majority, then the rights of all are compromised. The system tends toward chaos.
Consider how this political thought from the 1780’s applies to the illogical, inverted relationship between severity of act vs. the escalation of penalties: “A society that trades a little freedom for a little order will lose both and deserve neither.” Thomas Jefferson
.
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
.
COMMENT:
It is worth noting that (as the video shows) there have been numerous complaints about the erectile dysfunction ads and the FCC has the power to levy fines, but have not done so. Exhibitionists on the other hand do NOT face fines, but criminal sanctions! As a friend of mine says, “The figures don’t add up!”
.
